Equipment & Vehicle Repair vs Structural Trades
How does Equipment & Vehicle Repair (Trades & Physical) compare to Structural Trades (Trades & Physical) on AI displacement risk? Equipment & Vehicle Repair averages 58.7/100 (median 60.6, mode 59) across 33 roles, while Structural Trades averages 63.4/100 (median 65.6, mode 71) across 52 roles.
Equipment & Vehicle Repair
Trades & Physical
58.7
/100
Mean58.7
Median60.6
Mode59
33 roles
26
7
Green 26
Yellow 7
Red 0
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Structural Trades
Trades & Physical
63.4
/100
Mean63.4
Median65.6
Mode71
52 roles
49
2
1
Green 49
Yellow 2
Red 1
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Frequently Asked Questions
Which specialism is safer from AI — Equipment & Vehicle Repair or Structural Trades?
Structural Trades (Trades & Physical) averages 63.4/100 across 52 roles, while Equipment & Vehicle Repair (Trades & Physical) averages 58.7/100 across 33 roles — a 4.7-point gap.
How do Equipment & Vehicle Repair and Structural Trades compare on zone distribution?
Equipment & Vehicle Repair has 26 Green, 7 Yellow, and 0 Red zone roles. Structural Trades has 49 Green, 2 Yellow, and 1 Red zone roles. A higher proportion of Green zone roles indicates better overall AI resistance.
Compare Another
Open Specialism Comparison Tool
What's your AI risk score?
We're building a free tool that analyses your career against millions of data points and gives you a personal risk score with transition paths. We'll only build it if there's demand.
No spam. We'll only email you if we build it.
The AI-Proof Career Guide
We've found clear patterns in the data about what actually protects careers from disruption. We'll publish it free — but only if people want it.
No spam. We'll only email you if we write it.