Construction Support vs Structural Trades
How does Construction Support (Trades & Physical) compare to Structural Trades (Trades & Physical) on AI displacement risk? Construction Support averages 57.8/100 (median 58.0, mode 51) across 38 roles, while Structural Trades averages 63.4/100 (median 65.6, mode 71) across 52 roles.
Construction Support
Trades & Physical
57.8
/100
Mean57.8
Median58.0
Mode51
38 roles
32
6
Green 32
Yellow 6
Red 0
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Structural Trades
Trades & Physical
63.4
/100
Mean63.4
Median65.6
Mode71
52 roles
49
2
1
Green 49
Yellow 2
Red 1
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Frequently Asked Questions
Which specialism is safer from AI — Construction Support or Structural Trades?
Structural Trades (Trades & Physical) averages 63.4/100 across 52 roles, while Construction Support (Trades & Physical) averages 57.8/100 across 38 roles — a 5.6-point gap.
How do Construction Support and Structural Trades compare on zone distribution?
Construction Support has 32 Green, 6 Yellow, and 0 Red zone roles. Structural Trades has 49 Green, 2 Yellow, and 1 Red zone roles. A higher proportion of Green zone roles indicates better overall AI resistance.
Compare Another
Open Specialism Comparison Tool
What's your AI risk score?
We're building a free tool that analyses your career against millions of data points and gives you a personal risk score with transition paths. We'll only build it if there's demand.
No spam. We'll only email you if we build it.
The AI-Proof Career Guide
We've found clear patterns in the data about what actually protects careers from disruption. We'll publish it free — but only if people want it.
No spam. We'll only email you if we write it.