Automotive vs Structural Trades
How does Automotive (Trades & Physical) compare to Structural Trades (Trades & Physical) on AI displacement risk? Automotive averages 60.3/100 (median 61.8, mode 67) across 35 roles, while Structural Trades averages 63.4/100 (median 65.6, mode 71) across 52 roles.
Automotive
Trades & Physical
60.3
/100
Mean60.3
Median61.8
Mode67
35 roles
33
1
1
Green 33
Yellow 1
Red 1
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Structural Trades
Trades & Physical
63.4
/100
Mean63.4
Median65.6
Mode71
52 roles
49
2
1
Green 49
Yellow 2
Red 1
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Frequently Asked Questions
Which specialism is safer from AI — Automotive or Structural Trades?
Structural Trades (Trades & Physical) averages 63.4/100 across 52 roles, while Automotive (Trades & Physical) averages 60.3/100 across 35 roles — a 3.0-point gap.
How do Automotive and Structural Trades compare on zone distribution?
Automotive has 33 Green, 1 Yellow, and 1 Red zone roles. Structural Trades has 49 Green, 2 Yellow, and 1 Red zone roles. A higher proportion of Green zone roles indicates better overall AI resistance.
Compare Another
Open Specialism Comparison Tool
What's your AI risk score?
We're building a free tool that analyses your career against millions of data points and gives you a personal risk score with transition paths. We'll only build it if there's demand.
No spam. We'll only email you if we build it.
The AI-Proof Career Guide
We've found clear patterns in the data about what actually protects careers from disruption. We'll publish it free — but only if people want it.
No spam. We'll only email you if we write it.