Automotive vs Facility Services
How does Automotive (Trades & Physical) compare to Facility Services (Trades & Physical) on AI displacement risk? Automotive averages 60.3/100 (median 61.8, mode 67) across 35 roles, while Facility Services averages 54.9/100 (median 57.3, mode 59) across 42 roles.
Automotive
Trades & Physical
60.3
/100
Mean60.3
Median61.8
Mode67
35 roles
33
1
1
Green 33
Yellow 1
Red 1
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Facility Services
Trades & Physical
54.9
/100
Mean54.9
Median57.3
Mode59
42 roles
35
5
2
Green 35
Yellow 5
Red 2
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Frequently Asked Questions
Which specialism is safer from AI — Automotive or Facility Services?
Automotive (Trades & Physical) averages 60.3/100 across 35 roles, while Facility Services (Trades & Physical) averages 54.9/100 across 42 roles — a 5.4-point gap.
How do Automotive and Facility Services compare on zone distribution?
Automotive has 33 Green, 1 Yellow, and 1 Red zone roles. Facility Services has 35 Green, 5 Yellow, and 2 Red zone roles. A higher proportion of Green zone roles indicates better overall AI resistance.
Compare Another
Open Specialism Comparison Tool
What's your AI risk score?
We're building a free tool that analyses your career against millions of data points and gives you a personal risk score with transition paths. We'll only build it if there's demand.
No spam. We'll only email you if we build it.
The AI-Proof Career Guide
We've found clear patterns in the data about what actually protects careers from disruption. We'll publish it free — but only if people want it.
No spam. We'll only email you if we write it.