Automotive vs Construction Support
How does Automotive (Trades & Physical) compare to Construction Support (Trades & Physical) on AI displacement risk? Automotive averages 60.3/100 (median 61.8, mode 67) across 35 roles, while Construction Support averages 57.8/100 (median 58.0, mode 51) across 38 roles.
Automotive
Trades & Physical
60.3
/100
Mean60.3
Median61.8
Mode67
35 roles
33
1
1
Green 33
Yellow 1
Red 1
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Construction Support
Trades & Physical
57.8
/100
Mean57.8
Median58.0
Mode51
38 roles
32
6
Green 32
Yellow 6
Red 0
Safest Roles
At-Risk Roles
Frequently Asked Questions
Which specialism is safer from AI — Automotive or Construction Support?
Automotive (Trades & Physical) averages 60.3/100 across 35 roles, while Construction Support (Trades & Physical) averages 57.8/100 across 38 roles — a 2.5-point gap.
How do Automotive and Construction Support compare on zone distribution?
Automotive has 33 Green, 1 Yellow, and 1 Red zone roles. Construction Support has 32 Green, 6 Yellow, and 0 Red zone roles. A higher proportion of Green zone roles indicates better overall AI resistance.
Compare Another
Open Specialism Comparison Tool
What's your AI risk score?
We're building a free tool that analyses your career against millions of data points and gives you a personal risk score with transition paths. We'll only build it if there's demand.
No spam. We'll only email you if we build it.
The AI-Proof Career Guide
We've found clear patterns in the data about what actually protects careers from disruption. We'll publish it free — but only if people want it.
No spam. We'll only email you if we write it.